Digital Newsletter
Each week our editor Phil Alsop rounds up the most popular articles, videos and expert opinions. We compile this into a Digital Newsletter and send it straight to your inbox every week.
Digital Magazines
We'll let you know each time a new edition of MSP Channel Insights is released so that you're always kept up-to-date with the latest and greatest news and press releases.
Video Magazines
The MSP Channel Insights Video magazine contains the latest Zoom interviews with experts in the industry.
“Enterprise CISOs are grappling with the need to understand and manage new risks around generative AI without stifling innovation and becoming roadblocks within their organisations,” said Sandeep Johri, CEO at Checkmarx. “GenAI can help time-pressured development teams scale to produce more code more quickly, but emerging problems such as AI hallucinations usher in a new era of risk that can be hard to quantify. Checkmarx has successfully foreseen the problems that can arise with AI-generated code and we’re proud to be delivering next-stage solutions within the Checkmarx One platform today.”
Highlights of the global AI study include these findings showing the difficulty of establishing and enforcing governance:
Only 29% of organisations have established any form of governance
15% of respondents have explicitly prohibited the use of AI tools for code generation within their organisations
99% report that AI code-generation tools are being used regardless of prohibitions
70% say there is no centralised strategy for generative AI, with purchasing decisions made on an ad-hoc basis by individual departments
60% are worried about GenAI attacks such as AI hallucinations
80% are worried about security threats stemming from developers using AI
A graph with numbers and text
Description automatically generated with medium confidence
Only 29% of organisations have established any type of governance on the use of GenAI tools in their organisations
Many CISOs are seeking to build the right levels and types of governance in order to permit their application development teams to use AI coding tools. Given its ease of adoption, flexibility and utility, security leaders clearly understand its potential for helping to speed and scale application development in a time-pressured business environment.
However, generative AI is currently unable to follow secure coding practices or to produce truly secure code, which motivates some security teams to consider AI-driven security tools to help manage the proliferation of development teams’ AI-generated code. The Checkmarx study found that:
47% of respondents indicated interest in allowing AI to make unsupervised changes to code
6% said that they wouldn’t trust AI to be involved in security actions within their vendor tools
“The responses of these global CISOs expose the reality that developers are using AI for application development even though it can’t reliably create secure code, which means that security teams are being hit with a flood of new, vulnerable code to manage,” said Kobi Tzruya, Chief Product Officer at Checkmarx. “This illustrates the need for security teams to have their own productivity tools to manage, correlate and help them prioritise vulnerabilities, as Checkmarx One is designed to help them do.”
