AI trust gap in the workplace

Workday has published its latest global study, which found that an AI trust gap has formed in the workplace. Business leaders and employees are in agreement that AI holds great opportunities for business transformation, however, there is a lack of trust that it will be deployed responsibly, with employees showing an even deeper level of scepticism than their leadership counterparts.

  • Thursday, 11th January 2024 Posted 1 year ago in by Phil Alsop

Key findings include:

• Only 62% of business leaders (C-suite or their direct reports) welcome AI. This number is even lower among employees, at 52%.

• 23% of employees are not confident their organisation puts employee interests above its own when implementing AI.

• 70% of business leaders agree AI should be developed in a way that easily allows for human review and intervention.

• 42% of employees believe their company does not have a clear understanding of which systems should be fully automated and which require human intervention.

• 3 in 4 employees say their organisation is not collaborating on AI regulation.

• 4 in 5 employees say their company has yet to share guidelines on responsible AI use.

“There’s no denying that AI holds immense opportunities for business transformation. However, our research shows that leaders and employees lack confidence in, and understanding of, their organisations’ intentions around AI deployment within the workplace,” said Jim Stratton, chief technology officer, Workday. “To help close this trust gap, organisations must adopt a comprehensive approach to AI responsibility and governance, with a lens on policy advocacy to help strike the right balance between innovation and trust.”

“Ethical standards in the use of AI and ML are vital for long-term success. As we introduce more and more AI technologies, we are focused on building trust with customers and employees,” said Dan Cohen, chief information officer and director of operations at The Amenity Collective. “Our aspirational goal is to create a culture, at the very core of our brand, that adopts AI and empowers each person in our company to use it to do the right thing for our customers. I applaud Workday’s commitment to understanding and addressing the sentiment of leaders and employees so we can work to close the AI trust gap.”

Lack of Trust at all Levels of the Workforce

When it comes to organisations adopting and deploying AI responsibly, there is a lack of trust at all levels of the workforce, particularly from employees. Only 62% of leaders welcome AI adoption in their organisation and the same percentage of leaders are confident their organisation will ensure AI is implemented in a responsible and trustworthy way. At the employee level, that number drops even further to 52% and 55% respectively.

There is also uncertainty among employees and leaders that their organisation will implement AI in the right way. 23% of employees are not confident their organisation puts employee interests above its own when implementing AI, and leaders agree: 21% of leaders report they are not confident their organisations will put employee interests first.

Human Intervention with AI

Leaders and employees want human involvement in AI processes, but are unclear on the best way to do so. 70% of business leaders agree AI should be developed in a way that easily allows for human review and intervention. But 42% of employees believe their company does not have a clear understanding of which systems should be fully automated and which require human intervention.

Earlier Workday-commissioned research on AI further validates concerns around companies’ abilities to implement AI responsibly and effectively: nearly three-quarters (72%) of leaders said their organisation lacks the skills to fully implement AI and ML, and an even slightly higher percentage (76%) said their own knowledge of AI and ML applications needs improvement.

Need for Smart AI Governance with Transparency

Asked to imagine a future where AI is a part of everyday life, 42% of leaders and 36% of employees cite organisational frameworks and regulation as most important for building trustworthy AI.

However, there is a lack of organisation-wide visibility around AI regulation and guidelines. Three in four employees say their organisation is not collaborating on AI regulation and four in five say their company has yet to share guidelines on responsible AI use. 

AI agents break cover

Posted 4 days ago by Phil Alsop
In a global survey of IT leaders, Cloudera found that enterprises are keen on AI agents, but fears around data privacy, integration, and data quality...
Economist Impact is pleased to announce the inaugural AI Compute summit, scheduled for May 22nd 2025, at the Scandic Copenhagen in Copenhagen. This...

Majority of AI projects don't make it to market

Posted 5 days ago by Phil Alsop
SS&C Technologies Holdings has published findings from a new survey: governance, process orchestration and strategic planning are critical to...

Security and compliance risks make VPNs obsolete

Posted 5 days ago by Phil Alsop
Zscaler has published the Zscaler ThreatLabz 2025 VPN Risk Report, commissioned by Cybersecurity Insiders, which highlights the widespread security,...

AI tops tech growth charts

Posted 1 week ago by Phil Alsop
Despite high interest rates, economic slowdown, stricter regulations on big tech and AI, Trump's tariff policies, and global trade wars, which hit...

94% increase in network malware

Posted 1 week ago by Phil Alsop
Other key findings show an increase in crypto miner detections, a spike in zero-day malware, a drop in endpoint malware, a rise in Linux-based...

Data is not AI-ready

Posted 1 week ago by Phil Alsop
Despite rapid hybrid cloud adoption, enterprises struggle with file data migration, falling behind in AI-driven efficiencies and effective security.
96% of organizations attacked by ransomware said backups were targeted.