Ransomware - it doesn't pay to pay

Cybereason has published the results of their third annual ransomware study, commissioned to better understand the true impact of ransomware to businesses.

  • Thursday, 22nd February 2024 Posted 1 year ago in by Phil Alsop

This global study reveals ransomware attacks are becoming more frequent, effective, and sophisticated:

56 percent of organisations surveyed suffered more than one ransomware attack in the last 24 months.

It still ‘doesn’t pay to pay’ as almost 80 percent of organisations who paid the ransom were hit a second time

82 percent were hit again within a year

63 percent were asked to pay again

The report ‘Ransomware: The True Cost to Business 2024’ further revealed that of the organisations who opted to pay a ransom in return for their encrypted systems, only 47 percent received their data and solutions back uncorrupted. These findings emphasise why it does not pay to pay ransomware attackers, and organisations should instead focus on detection and prevention tactics to end ransomware attacks before material damage occurs.

“This year’s research shows that, while most businesses have a ransomware strategy in place, many are incomplete. They’re either missing a documented plan, or the right people to execute it. As a result, we see that many organisations are paying the ransom. Likewise whilst many have cyber insurance, too many simply don’t know if, or to what degree it covers them for ransomware attacks. This is problematic on several levels. It’s no guarantee that attackers won’t sell your data on the black market, that you’ll even get your full files and systems back, or that you won’t be attacked again.” - Greg Day, Global Field CISO (VP), Cybereason.

Further key findings of the study include:

Attackers are evolving and the supply chain shows weakness - 56 percent didn’t detect a breach for 3-12 months, with 41 percent of the attackers getting in via a supply chain partner.

Attacker demands increase at every stage - 78 percent were breached a second time, with 63 percent being asked to pay more.

The true cost is staggering - 46 percent estimate total business losses of $1-10 million and 16 percent estimate total business losses of over $10 million. Not to mention the loss of revenue, brand damage, and layoffs that followed.

Businesses don’t have the right tools - Less than half said their businesses are adequately prepared for the next attack. Whilst 87 percent of organisations increased spend, only 41 percent feel they have the right people and plans in place to manage the next attack.

Failure to prioritise testing and integrate generative AI tools raises concerns as agentic AI adds pressure.

CIOs 'overspend' on cloud

Posted 5 days ago by Phil Alsop
43% of CIOs say their CEOs and/or board of directors have concerns about their company’s cloud spend.
Research revealed at Coterie Connect event highlights shifting team structures, evolving skills priorities, and urgent training needed for partner...
Endava has launched its latest research report “AI and the Digital Shift: Reinventing the Business Landscape”.

3,000% surge in enterprise use of AI/ML tools

Posted 1 week ago by Phil Alsop
Zscaler has released the ThreatLabz 2025 AI Security Report, based on insights from more than 536 billion AI transactions processed between February...
Over one in four (28%) British small business owners have used AI tools to help run their business.

Tech fragmentation cited as biggest cyber challenge

Posted 1 week ago by Phil Alsop
New Palo Alto Networks data shows 82% of UK organisations confident in their use of AI, despite AI being identified as biggest cyber risk for 2025.
MIT researchers crafted a new approach that could allow anyone to run operations on encrypted data without decrypting it first.