AI vs. human: assessing cybersecurity performance

Hack The Box’s report examines the impact of AI on cybersecurity task performance, analysing productivity changes and performance differences across experience levels.

Hack The Box (HTB) has published findings from its latest AI-Augmented vs. Human-Only Cybersecurity Performance Benchmark Report. The research draws on data from its NeuroGrid Capture The Flag (CTF) competition, which compares AI-augmented and human performance on cybersecurity tasks.

The results show that AI integration can increase task completion speed depending on the proficiency of the AI-augmented team. Key findings indicate that AI-enabled teams completed tasks faster, generating up to 4.1x more output for elite teams and 1.4x more across all teams within a set timeframe.

AI-augmented teams also recorded a 70% higher challenge solve rate compared to top human-only teams, achieving a 3.2x higher solve-rate ratio across all participants.

The benchmark included 1,078 teams — 120 agentic AI teams and 958 human teams — participating in 36 cybersecurity challenges across nine technical domains and four difficulty levels over a three-day period.

The report highlights that the effects of AI adoption vary across experience levels and that workforce development strategies may need to account for these differences:
  • Early Career: AI can support less experienced teams in completing more challenges but may also lead to reduced efficiency in some cases. These teams were observed to be 12.5% slower on average, sometimes becoming dependent on iterative or unstructured workflows without sufficient oversight.
  • Mid Career: Mid-level operations saw the strongest improvement on medium-difficulty tasks, with a peak advantage of 3.89x.
  • Elite Teams: While the relative advantage in solve rate narrows at higher experience levels, AI-augmented elite teams demonstrated a speed increase, completing challenges 312% faster.
The findings suggest that automation of routine and mid-level tasks can deliver measurable productivity gains. At the same time, the report notes that over-reliance on automation in judgement-based tasks may affect long-term skill development and resilience. The competitive advantage lies not only in adopting AI tools, but also in developing the capability to effectively manage, validate, and govern AI-driven workflows within cybersecurity operations.
Hammer Distribution has formed a new strategic partnership with Stormshield. Under this agreement, Hammer will serve as a key distributor for...

Syspro launches marketplace

Posted 2 hours ago by Phil Alsop
New Marketplace gives customers access to trusted partner solutions that integrate with the Syspro platform.

Syncro and Guardz partner

Posted 2 hours ago by Phil Alsop
Guardz cybersecurity now available to MSPs through the Syncro Marketplace, with unified purchase, provisioning, and billing.
Arrow Electronics has signed an EMEA wide distribution agreement with Motorola Solutions, expanding Arrow’s security portfolio and strengthening...
Arrow Electronics has received four awards in the Broadcom 2025 Partner Awards that recognise its performance across the security ecosystem.

ThreatDown accelerates channel-first strategy

Posted 4 days ago by Phil Alsop
Nexus Partner Program launches with deal protection, margin retention, and new MDF and rebate structure.
inforcer introduces Copilot Manager to support MSPs in delivering AI services, including features related to monitoring and managing Shadow AI usage.
Guardz outlines how AI is influencing cybersecurity, with the report highlighting identity-related issues and vulnerabilities affecting MSPs, based...